By David Serfes
Pine Whispers
Going through high school takes a lot of responsibility, and during these four years students surely display it by applying to colleges, keeping good grades and by learning to drive a car. If students can be (mostly) trusted with the responsibility of driving a 4,000-pound machine to school every day, why aren’t we deemed responsible enough to leave campus for lunch?
Just about every junior and senior at Reynolds High School can admit to leaving campus to grab a bite to eat at a nearby Hardees, Bob’s or Qdoba every once in awhile. Sometimes, one accidentally leaves his or her lunch at home, or suffers from an unexpected hamburger craving during third period. These things happen, and nobody wants to go hungry because they have no food with them at school. There is no harm in allowing a licensed driver to temporarily leave campus for something as simple as food, and it’s a wonder that schools have a problem with this.
The current Reynolds student handbook is explicit in describing allowed activities during lunch. In its characteristic warm and cheery language, the handbook states, “Reynolds High School is a closed campus. Students may not leave for lunch. Students who choose to leave will be considered ‘skipping’ and are subject to disciplinary action.” Apparently, the school believes that lunch is an academic class period, and students are missing out on learning the nuances of eating by leaving campus to get food.
Now, it is understandable that Reynolds wants to keep an eye on all its students for liability concerns and to prevent students from skipping class. The lunch policy might be so strict because an occasional student who left for lunch in past years was involved in a car accident and the student’s family foolishly held the school responsible in a court of law. Maybe the school is afraid this could happen in the future.
Either way, the easiest solution to this concern would be to have some sort of waiver for students to sign during the registration for a parking sticker. By signing the waiver, students would agree to not hold the school responsible for any possible mistakes that happen outside of campus during their lunch period.
There will always be some students who take advantage of a privilege like this and leave campus in order to skip class. In that case, the school has every right to prevent a student from leaving. However, Reynolds should not assume, as it now does, that every student is leaving with the intent of skipping. Teachers in the class period the student has after lunch have an obligation to take note of tardies and absences and inform the main office so that action can be taken.
As students, we don’t ask for much and put up with a lot during the school day. Over the past few years, we have endured constant schedule changes that add more and more time between class and lunch. This year, first lunch doesn’t even begin until noon, creating a whole lot of stomach growling for students who missed breakfast in the morning. To make matters worse, no food or drink whatsoever is allowed in the halls and in classrooms. Students resort to calling parents to drop off lunch, which disrupts the parent who may be at work, or order a food delivery.
Seriously, someone has to feel bad for the Jimmy John’s delivery guy who makes multiple sandwich runs to the landing every other day, only to be barked at by a teacher or resource officer for violating school rules.
A recent call to Burke Street, done solely for the purpose of journalistic investigating, confirmed the workers there will hesitate to deliver food to Reynolds if the pizza isn’t for a class party. This is what a strict lunch policy is doing to our school: a damaged relationship with Burke Street and all of its savory garlic knots.
Letting mature young adults enjoy the freedom of an open campus during lunch adds a small privilege into the strict set of rules we follow every day. Our resource officers have much greater concerns than patrolling the parking lot during lunch, and surely they can’t enjoy having to do so.
Teachers and administrators: Try to remember how much of a burden school already is, and help us lighten the load with a Qdoba burrito and a Chick-fil-A milkshake thrown in.
Santiago • Nov 4, 2021 at 9:50 am
Even if we aren’t allowed to leave campus we should be able to order food. I have a very restrictive diet and couldn’t eat the school lunch if i wanted to, regardless of it being free this year.
Even when there are more customizable lunches you’re required to get meat (even if you have beans, which are a protein) and the salad bar would be just lettuce and dressing if we were allowed to get just that. As well as get milk unless you’re intolerant or allergic.
Even the snacks for purchase are all covered in cheese or contain eggs/dairy.
This means i have to spend time on my weekends if I’m prepping for the week or, more often than not spend time after school making my lunch for the next day. And let me tell you. It’s hard if not basically impossible to keep food any type of hot or warm from 7-8am to 12-2pm, depending on what time you leave and what time your lunch is.
Even with thermos’ and high quality lunch boxes
Scott Sanders • Oct 11, 2012 at 11:31 am
Just seeing this article and had to smile while reading and reminiscing over my own “lunch” experiences at Reynolds (Class of ’77).
It was a two year school then and so most students had their license and drove to school. Parking was an extreme issue and to secure a spot with the least amount of walking was not the issue as much as securing a spot period.
Given that, choosing to leave campus for lunch was often a critical decision in terms of losing one’s parking spot. Indeed, we had an open campus and a 45 minute lunch period to exploit our culinary desires. Seems every other day 5 or 6 kids would pile into one of those “float boat” cars (cars then were large enough to live in) and race off to one of the two nearby barbecue restaurants or the iconic Hardees. Even with 45 minutes, we barely had the time to make the roundtrip and find another parking space upon our return. I’m not sure how today’s students could achieve that within their limited 25 or 30 minute allocated time. I recall then, just as I’m certain is the case now, students consistently trickling back to class late and on occasion having accidents while rushing to and fro.
I do understand the school’s position, just as I understand the students’ desire to get away if even briefly from the daily routine of class structure. Probably a better battle to take up is why students can no longer sit on the circular wall at the front entrance for lunch. A spot on that wall was just as prized as a coveted parking space. That entrance wall was the social hour spot while the landing was designated more for smoking. But then again, that’s another story altogether.